Archive for the ‘Cheers & Jeers’ Category

Nationals playing naughty tricks

Thursday, July 5th, 2007

A collegue tells me that in his area, one large series of adverts in one of the big phone books by one national advertiser actually has many small adverts, all with local addresses, all across the area. They are desperate to look like a local company, and, to be fair, if they are prepared to open an office in every town to get an address, then fine.

Unfortunately, it turns out that the addresses being given are in fact not genuine. One turned out to be a derilict garage, whilst another, perhaps more worryingly, turned out to be a lady’s home, who said she had no knowledge of the advertiser and certainly hadn’t given permission.

Rest assured that this company has full permission and authority for both the addresses we use!

Empty housing - a social crime?

Friday, June 1st, 2007

This is a bit of a social comment. When I am out doing work for councils and companies, I get to go to some really charming places. Others are not so charming. Others, well, they leave you scratching your head.

This street in Manchester is typical of a number that I see when doing my job. It’s Leven street, M40 9DG, and I spent a good half hour talking to one of the few remaining residents.

Leven street: 8 empty homes, 1 occupied, 3 more empty (Click to zoom)

This used to be a good area, with strong social ties, but, with the rumours of redevelopment and the council pushing drug addicted and anti-social persons into the area, those who could started to leave.

It has in fact been 12 years since the first of these houses were boarded up. The remaining residents have campaigned, written letters, been to meetings, and tried almost every avenue open to them. Sadly, nothing has been done. Due to lack of heating and roof repairs, the remaining residents face damp problems coming through the walls, as well as social isolation and rising crime.

These houses, perfectly nice terraced houses, probably worth at least £40K each even in their current state, have just been abandoned, along with those who still live with them.

This seems to me to be an ideal case for an organisation like Shelter to lobby, and see what can be done towards getting these houses re-opened for lives and life, at a time when so many are in hostels, and affordable housing seems to be out of the reach of so many.

Locksmith on £2,750 benefit fraud charges - we need licensing!

Friday, April 20th, 2007

http://www.peterborough.gov.uk/page-4620

From August 19th 2005:

Locksmith sentenced on £2,750 benefit fraud charges

A self-employed locksmith, who fraudulently claimed more than £2,750 in job seeker’s allowance and housing benefit while working, was given a 40-hours community punishment order and told to pay £100 prosecution costs at Peterborough Magistrates’ Court yesterday (Thursday 18 August).
Darron Williams, 33, formerly of Oxney Road, Peterborough, but now living in Willingham, Cambridgeshire, pleaded guilty. The court was told that he has started to repay the £1,366 in job seeker’s allowance and £1,392 in housing benefit that had been over-paid.
The prosecution was brought jointly by the Department for Work and Pensions and Peterborough City Council using information provided by a government database that identifies anomalies between benefit claims and employment records.
“To date this financial year, we have secured four formal cautions, four financial penalties and two prosecutions through this procedure,” said Diane Baker, benefits fraud manager with Peterborough City Council.
“We will continue to work across departmental boundaries to minimise the opportunity for fraud and to ensure that those who abuse the system are brought to justice. Tackling fraud is a priority for the council.”

A “self-employed” locksmith who steals from the benefits agency? I know I wouldn’t want him round my house, drilling my locks. Yes, times are hard as a UK locksmith, but fraud? Perhaps worst of all, there is nothing, no law or regulation, that stops this criminal from trading as a locksmith! He wouldn’t be allowed to watch the sweeties in your local supermarket as a security guard now, but he can freely break into homes for money?!? The Institute of Certified Locksmiths (of which I am a full member) carries out background checks, and lobbies for regulation of locksmiths across the UK.

Write to your MP!

Car crime solution

Saturday, March 10th, 2007

The First Post is an online daily web newspaper, and I’m quite taken with it. And this made me laugh.

AVG Free is *not* discontinued

Friday, March 2nd, 2007

A lot of people might have been confused by this, I know I was. If you are using Grisoft’s AVGFree version 7.1, you’ll have seen various pop-ups telling you that it was being stopped. However, what that meant was that the product support for 7.1 was being stopped, and that you should upgrade to the 7.5 version, which is the same, but better, and still supported.

http://free.grisoft.com/doc/downloads-free75cnv/lng/us/tpl/v5 is the main downloads page. Get updated! And thanks Grisoft, for keeping us safe(r) on the internet.

3 in 1

Tuesday, February 13th, 2007

No, not a post about the perils of using the wrong lube on your locks, this is about three things all at once.

Firstly, when talking to a customer and agreeing a time, make sure you ask for more than the postcode! I actually did this once before, but that time there were only three possible houses. This time, it was 29 possible houses! Oops.

Secondly, people need to look around for better quotes, and, argueably, better behaved locksmiths. This customer was very happy with my charge, which was less than half what they paid last time. And, I feel it is morally wrong to fit a £2 lock to someone’s door, a lock that can be picked in under ten seconds (as I showed the customer after I swapped it), that has no anti-drill protection, and in fact, has no redeeming features at all. Amazingly, for that utter stiffing on cost, the other “locksmith” didn’t even fit the right length cylinder!

Thirdly, I *only* fit CEN 4 rated locks. That *is* my cheap option. I can go far more expensive, but I won’t go cheaper. For my own comfort of mind, I know that all my customers are that bit (lot?) safer, and for an extra, to be honest, £3 in profit, I just couldn’t live with myself if a lock that I fitted was so obviously substandard.

Hacking around in Google Maps

Saturday, January 20th, 2007

A brilliant feature of the already brilliant Google Maps system is that you can now place multiple markers, and get directions. Forget your old route finding tricks with a paper map, or even your GPS or a site like the AA’s. This is so fast and easy.

You are going out for the day to do a warrant run. You obviously don’t know the area like the back of your hand, and there are, in our example, 6 jobs.

Grab the postcodes, and do the following in a text editor, or even right there in the google maps page at http://maps.google.co.uk

from:BB5 7DD to:BB5 0EE to:BB5 5HH to:BB5 3JJ to:BB5 3QQ to:BB5 3EE (Don’t click this link)
First, it validates the postcodes (useful when making up examples like this!) It really should be

from:BB5 6DD to:BB5 5HH to:BB5 3QQ to:BB5 0EE to:BB5 3EE to:BB5 3JJ

A sample routePress go again, and the amazing Maps API at maps.google.co.uk will show you a neatly zoomed map with route directions (hidden by the little [x] until you click on each leg to expand it)

Now, that isn’t the best route. So you could re-type the string as

from:BB5 6DD to:BB5 5HH to:BB5 0EE to:BB5 3EE to:BB5 3JJ to:BB5 3QQ

and see if that makes things better. However, because Google programmers know their javascript, and how it should be used, you can do this instead. Go to the left side, where the postcodes are, then click and drag one. This will rearrange the map for you within moments. Visually, you will see the markers change if you tweak the first and last ones, and the mileage between each stop will also be recalculated in a few moments! After all of 30 seconds, you can optimise your route for the day. Brilliant.

For the next trick, switch to “Hybrid” mode in the top right of the map. This is my favourite view, and it pops up a road map overlayed on an aerial photgraph. Et voila! I’ve optimised my route. Now for a smart part 2. Zoom the map right in, then click on any of the markers. This will zoom to the destination. Now, using my leet locksmithing sense, I can tell that we are looking at a house, not a factory unit, and this tells me what sort of locks I can expect. The third one could be either, and the fourth looks like a garage, or at least somewhere without enough parking! And the last two are rows of houses again. Looks like a large house in a good area
Not that this part makes much odds. Were this a real run, the doors would be opened regardless. Also, we normally do commercial one day, and residential another. I just like to know! Gives me some idea of where to leave the van too - all those tools are heavy!

Small Claims Court online

Saturday, January 13th, 2007

So, as in the life of most businesses, we come to the crunch point, where a person or company has had work done, but has then decided that, since the emergency they were having is now over, they don’t want to pay. Never mind that most locksmiths won’t do work on account for unknown companies for exactly that reason. I now always run a credit check on any company I get calling me, since I am subscribed to a checking service it takes only a minute before heading off.

Well, back in August last year, I got a call from a solicitor. Urgent, need you tomorrow, please, please. Never even asked the cost. So I go and do the job. The solicitor tells me what he wants on site, I do it. All finished, I invoice, and wait. And wait. Eventually it goes overdue, so a phone call goes out. No response. I leave it another two weeks, and send out the reminder notice with penalties. I now do this as a matter of course, and I include a letter that tells the late payer why. Basically, I offer a low priced, high value service, and if you get 14 or 30 days to pay, you are, in reality, lucky. If you were stood outside your door late at night without any way to pay, in the rain, most locksmiths would kind of insist that you go with them to the cash machine. And I would, too. If you have ever wondered why, this is why. It is less hassle.
So anyway, we hear nothing. More phone calls, more chasing. It all adds up. Lots of promises that he will call back when he is in, that messages will be passed on, that he will call when he is back from court. But, of course, nothing happens. A second invoice with a letter goes out recorded. So he definately got that one. But still nothing. So, today, I went to https://www.moneyclaim.gov.uk/csmco2/index.jsp and signed up.

This handy page is actually the latest court idea for small claims, and it allows you to file a Small Claims action via the internet. It’s a pretty naff interface, but I got through it without too many issues. So papers are filed.

But our man is a solicitor. Aside from knowing he could easily pay if he wanted to, this also means I can find him online at the Law Society. So I did. And I asked them what they thought of a solicitor who refuses to pay his debts. They said call back when I filed papers, please. In the meantime, I found he has also not paid another locksmith I know, for doing the same thing, a repossession lock change, a few months later. So today, I called the Law Society, and let them know about their deadbeat lawyer. I also let the other locksmith know, so he can do the same thing.

It really is sad that some people abuse their position. Some locksmiths do, and some lawyers do, just like everything else. But it is very silly for a lawyer who claims to specialise in bankruptcy law and repossession work to play such silly games. I wonder what the Law Society will say to him? Actually, I wonder more what he will say to them…

Phoenix locks Ltd closed by court action

Tuesday, October 31st, 2006

A company director whose firm charged customers up to eight times more than the prices it quoted was fined last Thursday.

Watford magistrates convicted Mark Makowski of Phoenix locks Ltd, based in Potters Bar, on five charges of consenting and conniving to mislead customers when his company committed the offences.

The court heard that Phoenix quoted a Watford householder £90 for the replacement of two locks in August 2004. Theywere subsequently charged £347 for the work.

Another customer from Hampstead, London, was quoted £120 after locking themselves out. They were subsequently charged more than £1,000.

Watford magistrates fined Makowski, of High Rd, Wormley, Broxbourne, £500 for each offence, disqualified him as a director and banned him from driving for a year because he used his car for business use. The ban is suspended pending an appeal by Makowski.

Phoenix Ltd was also fined £2,500 and ordered to pay £1,341.40 in compensation to customers. Hertfordshire trading standards court costs of £5,800 will also be paid by Makowski and Phoenix.

But will it stop him? (He has been in trouble before for sharp practices, and is well known in locksmithing circles for all the wrong reasons.) See this Hertfordshire County Council press release for more.